The results of this test phase were not rated, as they are not a traditional protection function of a Mac protection solution. For this reason, the lab examined how well the packages also deal with Windows malware specimens.
#Dr cleaner slow down mac mac os
While Windows malware is incapable of harming Mac OS X, it can, however, harness the Mac as a platform to continuously re-infect a network. Many Macs also work in heterogeneous networks together with Windows PCs. The lab used 120 selected Mac malware specimens that it collected a few months prior to the test. They only detect 49 to 98.33 percent of the malware tested. Web, Avira, Canimaan Software and ProtectWorks. There is a sliding scale of detection for the products of Dr. Four additional packages make minor errors and detect 99.17 percent: Avast, Kaspersky, Sophos and Symantec.
In the detection of malware, 4 out of 12 packages achieve top performance of 100%: AVG, Bitdefender, ESET and Microworld. For 100% detection performance, it does require roughly 10% system resources, however. The package offering the best detection in combination with the lowest system load is from AVG. Most of the other solutions in fact require up to 10% system resources for security performance, in some cases even more.Ī total of 4 out of the 12 tested security suites are available free of charge: AVG, Avast, Sophos and Avira. They require for their own performance a mere 1 to 2% of system resources. The two charts with the test results quickly reveal that the protection solutions from Bitdefender and ESET, despite 100% detection rate, cause little or no burden on the system. In some cases: top security performance – hardly any system load
0 kommentar(er)
